Brighton Leadership Group

Share on linkedin
Share on facebook
Share on twitter

What is Your Stance?

Are you as tired of the term “unprecedented times” as we are? Cliché or not, it is a pretty accurate summary of 2020. The tension surrounding today’s US election is adding one more layer to many people’s emotional overload.

Leaders are in the unique position of needing to create a container for the emotions and stress of their teams as well as managing their own. It is helpful to know your own inclinations or tendencies during stress, as well as understand the different coping strategies that may be present in your team members.

Enneagram teachers have expanded psychologist Karen Horney’s explanation of the three main interpersonal coping strategies (aggression, withdrawal and compliance – complex versions of fight, flight and freeze) to help understand how different personalities respond to stress. Suzanne Stabile calls these instinctual approaches “stances”:

AGGRESSIVE STANCE

  • These are the leaders who are quick to take action. They are assertive and fast-paced, always working to create the future. They don’t stop for introspection, but will jump into whatever they see needs to be done, trying to “act” themselves out of the situation.
  • This can either be inspiring to their teams or come across as callous and cold.
  • In crisis, this leader asks “Why don’t they just DO something?!”

DEPENDENT STANCE

  • Very attuned to the experiences and reactions of the people around them, these leaders are present-focused and tend to look outward for solutions. Under stress they will internalize problems, assuming that it is their fault and also their responsibility to find the person with the right solution.
  • These leaders can be seen as either caring or frustratingly indecisive.
  • In crisis, this leader wonders “Why don’t they check in with the people around them?!”

WITHDRAWN STANCE

  • Skilled observers, these leaders have a tendency to turn inwards. They prefer to wrestle with problems alone and tend to lack conviction that they can make a difference. They see everything going on around them, but don’t want to take action until they have developed a perfect solution. Their actions are often determined by what they believe people in their role are “supposed” to do.
  • Others perceive these leaders either as thoughtful and steady or aloof and even passive-aggressive.
  • In crisis, this leader asks “Why aren’t they taking time to think this through?!”

As with most things in life, there is no perfect approach and balance is important. All three stances – reflection, connection with others, and bold action – are needed.

Here are questions you can ask in any crisis to help you lead from a broader perspective instead of your own default:

  1. What would it look like if I approached or leaned into the problem? How can I close the gap?
  2. What would it look like if I confronted or challenged the situation? How can I clear away the obstacles?
  3. What would it look like if I stepped back or away from the problem? How can I get some distance?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

More Articles

change succeed

4 Tips to Succeed When Leading at the Pace of Change

Would you say the pace of change has increased, decreased or remained the same? Your perception matters and it impacts every facet of your leadership. …

Read More →
strategies of successful leaders

Strategies of Successful Leaders

Over the last few weeks we recorded a series of videos addressing leadership challenges identified by members of the group Scott mentors from the Executive’s …

Read More →
lead with purpose

3 Ways to Lead With Purpose

We are celebrating Freedom week in honor of the Rebel Leader Community launch. You are free to lead with purpose is the theme of today’s …

Read More →
A curious leader

The Case for Curious Leadership

Nothing new comes from the status quo. There is no new awareness, no problem solving, no value creation, no innovation and no adaptability without asking …

Read More →
Scroll to Top