Brighton Leadership Group

Share on linkedin
Share on facebook
Share on twitter

Team versus Group

WinWin
When is a team not a team? When it’s really a group!
Real teams have a clearly defined mission for which they hold themselves mutually accountable and produce a collective work product. Just because people are gathered to do something does not automatically make them a team. It takes intentional effort to move from being a group to a team.
A few distinctions between a team and a group include:

  • Team members exchange individual accountability for mutual group accountability and shared group responsibility
  • Teams identify and reach consensus on their common goal and approach while a group looks to the leader to define the goal and approach
  • Teams are small enough that they can connect and communicate easily and frequently

Amazon talks about the “two pizza team” or 2PTs, for short. This has less to do with their food of choice and all about creating a real team which is autonomous, accountable and small enough to stay connected.
The more people you add to a team; the more connections are required. The formula is n(n-1)/2 = the number of connections required. A team of six has fifteen points of connection. A group that is twice that size has 12(12-1)/2= 66 points of connection to manage.
Large numbers of people cannot function as a team. The bigger the group, the more the cost of communicating, coordinating and collaborating with each other crushes “team members” to the point that the potential productivity of the individual and team is obliterated.
An example of a group is direct reports that meet with their manager but have individual performance requirements. The president of a company and her executives are a group unless there is focused effort to build trust, achieve results and mutual accountability. An example of a real team is a project team that succeeds or fails together based on the results of the project. However, many project teams are really groups of individual contributors not teams.
It’s helpful to recognize that there is a difference between a real team and a group. Before you tout the fact that you value teams, make sure that you are willing to invest the time, energy and effort required to create a team. Sometimes a group is good enough. Next week we will cover some of the approaches to building teams.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

More Articles

change succeed

4 Tips to Succeed When Leading at the Pace of Change

Would you say the pace of change has increased, decreased or remained the same? Your perception matters and it impacts every facet of your leadership. …

Read More →
strategies of successful leaders

Strategies of Successful Leaders

Over the last few weeks we recorded a series of videos addressing leadership challenges identified by members of the group Scott mentors from the Executive’s …

Read More →
lead with purpose

3 Ways to Lead With Purpose

We are celebrating Freedom week in honor of the Rebel Leader Community launch. You are free to lead with purpose is the theme of today’s …

Read More →
A curious leader

The Case for Curious Leadership

Nothing new comes from the status quo. There is no new awareness, no problem solving, no value creation, no innovation and no adaptability without asking …

Read More →
Scroll to Top